Search published articles


Showing 2 results for Radiology

Ali Garavand, Shahram Ghanbari, Saeid Ebrahimi, Mojtaba Kafashi, Frozandeh Ahmadzadeh,
Volume 1, Issue 2 (3-2015)
Abstract

Introduction: Today, using information technology in organizations is necessary. The Picture Archiving and Communication System (PACS)‌‌, as a computer tool, can provide conditions to create no movies medical imaging centers‌, if companied with other requirements . On the other hand, the evaluation of technology acceptance can be helpful in successful implementation of system. The aim of this study was to determine the effective factors in adopting Picture Archiving and Communication System (PACS) in Shiraz educational hospitals.

Method: The present study is a cross-sectional descriptive analytical survey. The study population consisted of all radiology staff in Shiraz educational hospitals that used picture archiving and communication system. The data gathering tool was TAM questionnaire and data were analyzed using SPSS v.17 software, and descriptive statistical methods and statistical correlation tests such as regression, independent sample t-test and ANOVA.

Results: The findings shown that perceived ease of use was significantly correlated with both perceived use and actual use (r=0.2, r=0.1) respectively. Perceived usefulness was also significantly correlated with perceived use and actual use (r=0.5, r=0.1) respectively.

Conclusion: The results shown that perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use are effective factors in adopting PACS that must be considered in evaluation and planning.


Mohsen Soleimani, Ali Nasiri,
Volume 6, Issue 4 (3-2020)
Abstract

Introduction: Poor User Interface design can be one of the probable reasons of users’ error and reduced incentive in using health information systems such as PACS. Heuristic evaluation is one the methods for assuring the proper user interface design of health information systems such as PACS.
Method: This study was a descriptive-analytic research conducted in 2019 through using Nielsen usability checklist. The study setting was Zanjan University of Medical Sciences and data were analyzed in SPSS 25 using descriptive statistics.
Results: In whole, 130 problems were found in 293 usability cases. The most common usability problems include privacy (66.66%), Visibility of System Status (65.52%), and Flexibility and Minimalist Design (60%) and the lowest number of UI design problems were associated with the Pleasurable and Respectful Interaction with the User (14.29%).
Conclusion: Usability Evaluation can identify the reasons of problems that may cause medical errors or users' resistance in working with the system. Therefore, it is necessary for system developers whose systems are widely used in important centers to pay more attention to all standards in designing the system and to prevent the occurrence of errors.
 


Page 1 from 1     

© 2025 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Journal of Health and Biomedical Informatics

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb